ArminBuilder

Members
  • Content Count

    31
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

4 Neutral

About ArminBuilder

  • Rank
    Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Central Virginia
  • Interests
    Passive House, off-grid, sustainable design, self-sufficient design
  1. Ah, THAT is where it was hiding. Thank you It is such a useful capability (when needed), such a shame we can't use the Plant Chooser to "Select Object". Not complaining!
  2. Dumb question, but I swear I saw one time how to do this. I think I want to plant a lot of trees on a section of terrain (in a feature would be perfect). Is there a way to do it without dragging out a hundred and copy/pasting the group all over the place? Like a "fill terrain area"?
  3. I am not arguing, just pointing out that the software could help with plumbing circuits (and I will add, hvac to that). HD provides a mechanism to do that for foundations, framing/roofing, electrical, cabinets, etc. Every one of them could be drawn with CAD and 3D shapes/soffits. So why does HD offer ANY layout and design capabilities? To save me time showing contractors what the objectives are. The end result - after consultation with the engineers - will almost certainly be different, and that is expected. And what is built will never be exactly what is on the blueprint, and that also is exp
  4. Agreed! I have a very similar situation, and HD Pro does exceedingly little to help me. At least help me route water, sewer, and hvac ... it does not need to specify fittings, sizes, or anything (though it would be super cool if it was that smart). I can do all my hvac flow modeling on SimScale, and figure out plumbing pex / pipe sizes and fittings with PlumbingCAD or QuickPlumb or something. Or do it all manually, which is the sucky option when the plans have to change. IMHO no house plan - regardless of who will make final decisions - can be considered complete until plumbing an
  5. @DavidJPotter , @solver Just thought I would pass this along ... Digging in the "Edit > Defaults... > Roof" menu, I discovered the "Segment Angle at Curved Wall" option. I saw this before, but its purpose did not click until I read the help page for it. Setting this to a low value makes the app much more accurate when it carves out a hole for the roof around curved walls, but is limited to 6 degree segments. Sometimes it lets more of the wall through, depending on the radius of the curve. There are pros and cons to this. Smaller segments mean more manu
  6. Thank you both for your responses! Eric, not sure how long it would have taken for me to realize that the roof was the culprit, thank you for pointing it out. I agree that the software could handle curved walls better, if such improvement is even possible given all the other things HD does for us. Nonetheless, there are occasions (at least in what I do) where things like this are necessary, so I search for options. David, thank you so much for demonstrating the roof plane polylines, it made it clear exactly what needs to be done. Manipulating them is indeed a little fin
  7. The walls on the taller (inner) structure do not paint to its ceiling. How can I make them do that? By "paint", I mean the walls of the circular structure are not drawn correctly. They are truncated at the lower ceiling, not the upper ceiling (or roof line, if you wish) to which they belong. Edit - added drawing In the cross-section image below, I have drawn a red line to indicate the expected wall height of the inner structure "should" be. The orange indicates where there walls are being truncated. Bizarrely, on the left of the picture, you can see a small column
  8. Hello all. Setting aside the question of why someone would do a thing like this, I have a question related to walls, and how they relate to roof heights on a structure. I have attached a simple plan and an image that demonstrates the problem. The walls of the interior (taller) structure paint to the ceiling of the larger structure, not that of the interior structure to which they belong. I suspect the answer is simple, but it is evading me. Thanks for any tips! -Armin experiment.plan
  9. Thanks for the great replies. Both solutions work in their own way. For my purposes, Jo Ann's solution works best, and has the benefit of allowing me to keep the heights for the floors. That is a great tip!
  10. Good evening. A quick question. My example scenario is a 3 story building, where the top floor is a rental. A stair well runs up the inside of the building to the 3rd floor, leaving floors 1 & 2 inaccessible. Ideally, the stairs would be a straight run to the 3rd floor, so my thought was to make floor 2 of the stairwell "open below". However, I cannot find a way to make the stairs complete a full run from floor 1 to floor 3 without hacking in a small segment of floor 2. Please see attached plan. The goal is for the stairs to run uninterrupted all the
  11. Thanks for the info. I tried that approach (adjusting level 0 heights), and it will work. I do find the height numbers in level 0 incredibly confusing though. They just don't make sense to my brain - I probably do not understand the relationship between "floor below" and actual floor height in level 1. I find myself switching between 0 and 1 all the time trying to get things adjusted correctly. More importantly for me, the foundation seems to insist on creating a stem wall, which is not used with ICF structures - ICF sits directly on the footer. I could not find a setting to make s
  12. @solver, oh, that is interesting! So, I turned on auto build foundation, and could not reproduce the deep foundation you got (re-downloaded the plan I attached above to confirm). Strangely, I did finally get it to behave, but I have no idea why. No changes other than to turn on auto build foundations. Here is what I did... - I rebuilt the sunken structure (have done it many times), still got the same behavior - Selected all of the bad structure (on floor 1), and moved it to a new location - this prompted to turn off auto roof build. - Turned auto roof b
  13. Thank you for your quick response David! I agree that manual adjustment does solve the problem. I had hoped that there might be some explanation or solution for why the app does that to the wall. For example, if I recreate the same structures in one of the provided New Plan styles, the front wall does not do that. I will spend a little more time playing with my settings and see if I can discover the root cause. If not, manual adjustment will do the trick. Thanks also for pointing out the terrain challenges that will go along with the stepped foundation, but from experi
  14. Hello folks. I can not figure this one out. I want to create a room that steps down. So I set the floor and ceiling down and everything works, except the front wall ... its foundation goes down to some arbitrary depth. Have spent quite some time trying to get that one wall to match the others, and have not found the problem. Even deleted the foundation "floor", but still no joy. Plan and image attached. Be aware that ... - I use from the bonus and manufacturers catalog - The plan has User materials - you can replace with anything that paints like a wall board
  15. Thank you! I will back up everything before attempting any of this. Modifying the default template is something I may try once the camera issue is fixed, so appreciate your explanation.